CHICAGO – Patrick McDonald of HollywoodChicago.com appears on “The Morning Mess” with Dan Baker on WBGR-FM (Monroe, Wisconsin) on March 21st, 2024, reviewing the new streaming series “Manhunt” – based on the bestseller by James L. Swanson – currently streaming on Apple TV+.
New Spider-Man storyline
Submitted by Dustin on January 8, 2008 - 4:44pm
Printer-friendly versionE-mail page to friendPDF version
Can anyone explain the new Spider-Man half assed retcon?
Does anyone honestly think it’s a good idea?
The Terrorists Win
Amazing Spider-Man #546, the first issue of “Brand New Day,” and the first storyline of the new bachelor Spider-Man…
…sold out its run.
So how is the series?
So how is the series?
Stan Lee!
Artwork honoring Stan Lee:
http://1988stantheman.blogspot.com/
I hope he bangs Betty Brandt
It’s sad for the artform but probably more beneficial commercially. Remember the Death of Superman and how the line expanded after he died?
On www.superdickery.com it was pointed out that comic books used to recycle stories every 8 months because there would be an almost completely new audience.
Here’s a summary of where
Here’s a summary of where they’re going…
http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/Spider-Man/BND/StatusQuo.html
MagnoliaFan?
Where are we when we need you, MagnoliaFan?
Marvel's "Biggest Mistake" Ever
Marvel Editor-in-Chief Joe Quesada has been saying for years that the Spider-Man status-quo should mean he’s single, despite the fact Spider-Man’s been married in the main continuity for 20 years. Quesada’s solution? Erase the last 20 years of Spider-Man comics.
Madison Carter, an official Marvel historian and author of the Marvel Handbook wrote, “This story/arc/retcon is the biggest mistake Marvel has ever done.” A Newsrama poll, which are typically pretty neutral, had 65% voting it “Worst. Thing. Ever.”
Here’s an explanation from Newsarama:
It gets worse. Straczynski, who’s had a pretty popular run on the book, had the chance to write the retcon as his swan song. But changes in the last issue almost caused him to take his name off the book, something very rare in comics.
JMS then clarified his problem:
What he doesn’t explain, since he’s emailing a web site for the comic nerd community, is the big elephant in the room: this is Marvel’s solution to the storyline you might have heard about last year, where Spider-Man went on TV and unmasked. Now, everyone in the entire world has forgotten.
What’s particularly annoying is that Marvel made this mistake almost exactly a decade ago. After the popularity of DC’s “Death of Superman” and “Batman: Knightfall,” Marvel decided to shake up Spider-Man. Their solution was the Clone Saga, where it was revealed that a Spider-Man had been a clone for the past 250 issues. This proved so massively unpopular that Marvel had to change course mid-storyline and put things back the way they were, which caused the story to last years. According to the Wikipedia entry,
Marvel canceled most of their Spider-Man titles and is releasing the main one, Amazing, with three issues a month and four creative teams. Before I found out how the story would play out, I was excited. Now I’m not sure I’m ever going to buy a main-continuity Spider-Man book ever again.
This honestly feels like one of the most insulting serial storytelling gimmicks in the history of pop culture.
USA wrote up the
USA wrote up the story:
http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2008-01-09-spider-man-marriage_N…
Part of the Problem, Not the Solution
Yesterday at the comics store, I told the clerk, a nice guy to talk to, that I was really conflicted about buying the new Spider-Man and contributing another enabling sales number to Marvel. He asked, “Why?” I said, “I don’t know, but I can’t remember being this mad at a comic. It makes me feel like a kid. I should know better, but I don’t.” He kept asking, “Why?”
So I ended up buying the new issue of Amazing Spider-Man.
Your dollar is your vote.
Your dollar is your vote.
I Know, I Know
It wasn’t bad. It’s Steve McNiven art (the guy who did Civil War), and Dan Slott writing. But it’s just not good enough to justify the retcon. And I promise I won’t buy any more.
The clerk just kept saying, “This isn’t permanent. They put in a bunch of outs. Why [are you upset]?”
Why does every Batman story
Why does every Batman story arc start with him coming back after being gone for a long time?
Uh...?
Bruce Wayne owns a plane.
Ha! I just read Face the
Ha!
I just read Face the Face and it was about him returning after a year doing JLA stuff. I assume Crisis related.
And what does Stan Lee have
And what does Stan Lee have to say about all this?
Stan Lee Cried
I can’t find any attribution, but I vaguely remember that Spider-Man married MJ because that’s what happened in the daily newspaper strip. Which (again, I’m not sure if I remember rightly), was written by Stan Lee. So Lee himself initiated the story.
Either way, he was invited to the wedding and still showed up.
Well Shane, we know what you
Well Shane, we know what you think of Spider-Man:
The real philosophical question, did Spider-Man cheat on MJ when this picture was taken?
College Experimentation
I retconned this out of my memory.
What about all the villains
What about all the villains he fought? And why did they put him back in Aunt May’s house?
It really pulls Spider-Man away from every other series in the Marvel Universe. Not just now, but everything they’ve done for the last 20 years.