CHICAGO – When two brothers confront the sins of each other and it expands into a psychology of an entire race, it’s at a stage play found in Chicago’s Invictus Theatre Company production of “Topdog/Underdog,” now at their new home at the Windy City Playhouse through March 31st, 2024. Click TD/UD for tickets/info.
Film Review: It All Ends With Satisfying ‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2’
CHICAGO – So this is how it ends – not with a whimper but with a big, magical bang. After a decade of captivating movie audiences worldwide, will “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2” appease the fans who have been eagerly anticipating the end of the saga of the boy who lived? It almost certainly will. It’s hard to imagine fans leaving the final “Potter” film with deep disappointment in this satisfying conclusion. But “satisfying” is not the same as captivating, magical, or spectacular. “Deathly Hallows” is none of those things. It’s a well-executed slice of fantasy entertainment that nonetheless fails to rise to the level of true classic.
Rating: 3.5/5.0 |
With nary a recap, “Deathly Hallows – Part 2” dives right into the magical action. One of the problems with the film is that there’s almost no traditional narrative arc at all, meaning that the film doesn’t really stand on its own. Great final chapters work in context of what came before AND as their own film. “Deathly Hallows – Part 2” is almost all final act; all climax. Yes, this was inevitable after they decided to cut the final book in half but it has left a final film that’s so focused that it can be a bit monotonous. Of course, fans would say that the battle between Voldemort and Harry Potter is so universe-shaking that it deserved an entire film, but I look forward to being able to watch both “Deathly Hallows” films in one sitting so both halves have the weight that I think they could if they were a complete, single work.
Read Brian Tallerico’s full review of “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2” in our reviews section. |
The plot is simple. Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint), and Hermione (Emma Watson) prepare for and fight the final battle against the evil Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes). That’s really the entirety of “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2” from a plot perspective. Sure, there are a few minor subplots and an entertaining early sequence in the vault of Bellatrix Lestrange (Helena Bonham Carter), but the most famous trio of child wizards in history get back to Hogwarts relatively early in the film and the rest is the legendary battle. Severus Snape (Alan Rickman), McGonagall (Maggie Smith), the ghost of Dumbledore (Michael Gambon), and even Neville Longbottom (Matthew Lewis) will all play major roles in the final battle of all final battles.
There’s a fine line between artistic interpretation and simple execution. The David Yates-directed “Potter” films (#5-7) have, with few exceptions, nailed the execution. They are well-shot (Eduardo Serra’s work here is particularly strong) with moving scores and expert production values. The final scenes in the saga of Harry Potter look “right” but don’t produce the awe of truly great fantasy films that comes with true artistic interpretation. The scope of the battle more than once brought to mind the last hour of “Lord of the Rings: Return of the King” but without the personal touch of that work.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2
Photo credit: Warner Bros. Pictures