CHICAGO – Patrick McDonald of HollywoodChicago.com audio review for the streaming series “Emily in Paris” the adventures of Emily Cooper and her fanciful/fashionable Paris friends and lovers, now in its fourth season. Episodes 1-5 currently on Netflix.
Captivating Tale of Primal Manhood in David Gordon Green’s ‘Joe’
![Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version](/sites/all/modules/print/icons/print_icon.gif)
![E-mail page to friend E-mail page to friend](/sites/all/modules/print/icons/mail_icon.gif)
![PDF version PDF version](/sites/all/modules/print/icons/pdf_icon.gif)
![]() Rating: 4.0/5.0 |
CHICAGO – This week in movies about men we have “Joe”, a wild drama about Texas males at their most primal. It is the newest film from director David Gordon Green, and features Nicolas Cage in some of his finest work.
The film’s leading man is the title character played by Cage, a boss to a group of day laborers, and man with his own troubled past of fighting (against local lunatic Willie-Russell, played by Ronnie Gene Blevins). When working on the job with his men, Joe encounters a young man named Gary (Tye Sheridan), who lives in a condemned house with his alcoholic father Wade (Gary Poulter) and his mother and sister. Under Joe’s wisdom, Gary tries to understand the notion of honest living, while Wade abandons the family in search of food and alcohol. The two men take their own paths, leading to a climax that has Joe at the center of everyone’s future.
As the movie’s spirit animal, Cage keeps the film charged, and unpredictable. This is a performance narrowed in on his potential, unhinged and huge all at once, but marking the return of taking his drama seriously. Unmistakably, he continues to be proud of the maniac he has always been, but plays this character with a grand sense of authority.
Cage appears opposite a group of supporting men who are vivid in their raw qualities. The young Ty Sheridan, after having expressed maturity in films from Terrence Malick and Jeff Nichols, presents a sturdy image of a young man trying to find an identity of maturity through hard work. On the different side of composure is Blevins’ tumultuous Willie-Russell, who confronts the theme’s defining characteristic of fear by wearing its mark on his face. His level of being a sociopath is equal to some throw away villains in action movies, but Blevins shows a true masculine fear in his worn face, even when he is screaming about his indifference to death.
![Nicolas Cage Nicolas Cage](http://www.hollywoodchicago.com/sites/default/files/joe 2_0.jpg)
Nicolas Cage as the title character in ‘Joe’
Photo credit: Roadside Attractions
These grounded performances in “Joe” are upstaged by one presentation whose acting is too raw to be categorized as a typical performance. Non-actor Gary Poulter provides an entirely ruthless force as Wade, the film’s main villain, but its most tragic figure of manhood. His usage in the film speaks to what potential non-actors provide when directors seek to express the non-fictional elements within their fictional story. With Poulter’s actual background (look it up AFTER seeing the film), he is as flesh-and-blood as the non-cinematic environment in which this film takes place, his raspy voice and grizzled mug completely removed from the type of calculated showmanship that has become Hollywood acting. When he strikes Sheridan in the face with a heavy fist (like in the film’s mesmerizing first shot) or stands up to Cage, Poulter provides a rare sensation of witnessing purity in a Hollywood film.
Carrying the soft interiors of Cage’s title character, director Green frames the beauty of his locations with the help of his right-hand cinematographer, Tim Orr. The camera has a documentary’s eye, breathing in the characters (actors and non-actors) within their environment, while then providing a starkness to its narrative parts. Green still has a mythic love for slow motion, as a scene with Poulter pop-and-lockin’ is filmed with the same meditative quality as his running young non-actors in “George Washington”, or even the break-dance interlude in “Pineapple Express”.
With its definitive gritty disorder, “Joe” can be a messy film in itself, taking on Cage-like tangents to service aura more than narrative (a scene involving Cage looking for his dog, for example). Other storytellers would fear these offshoots, but Green robustly utilizes them to fortify his grand interest of the story’s environment and ethos. He succeeds, with the film becoming as curiously untamable as the modern men it presents.
![Joe Joe](http://www.hollywoodchicago.com/sites/default/files/joe_0.jpg)
Joe (Nicolas Cage) and Gary (Tye Sheridan) in ‘Joe’
Photo credit: Roadside Attractions
“Joe” is another title from a list of recent films (such as “Mud”, “Dallas Buyers Club” and “The Place Beyond the Pines”) that shows an ever-fleeting definition of manhood. With its variegated subject beings, who express the vitality in fear and the subsequent demand for power, Green focuses on manhood to its primal origins. Through the wisdom of “Joe”, the ideas of how to succeed in the world are simplified: you work like a dog, you stand up for yourself, and you’ll make it. Forget the presence of police, or even businesses that interact foremost in legalese. There is no rule greater than the unwritten code that these men follow, in which the struggle for power is concluded in Cain & Abel-like violence. And yet there is a concrete truth within a piece of dialogue, spoken by a woman (Adrienne Mishler’s Connie, a lost female character) to a silent Joe, as the emotions within the movie near their explosion: “You’re pretending to sleep, but I know you’d cry if I said the wrong thing.”
Meditating on these evasive notions, Green orchestrates a Texan drama that is larger than answers. With its vivid environment and ethos, “Joe” manifests the complicated soul underneath a man’s flesh and blood.
![]() | By NICK ALLEN |