TV Review: ‘The Big Bang Theory’ Opens New Season With a Whimper

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionE-mail page to friendE-mail page to friendPDF versionPDF version
Average: 5 (1 vote)

CHICAGO – If “The Big Bang Theory” is truly among the better sitcoms in prime-time, that’s saying a great deal about the current state of television comedy. I was genuinely interested in checking out this show after hearing the rapturous response from viewers and critics, and especially after seeing co-star Jim Parsons snag the Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series away from Alec Baldwin.

So I was rather shocked when I sat down to view the fourth season premiere of “The Big Bang Theory,” and found myself sitting in appalled silence for the entirety of the show’s 21 minutes. It reminded me of the phony sitcom on “Extras,” where the struggling actor played by Ricky Gervais is forced to stay imprisoned in an endless nightmare of shrill stereotypes, obnoxious catchphrases and canned laughter. In all fairness, “Theory” is reportedly shot in front of a live studio audience, but their laughter sounds suspiciously like the work of a skilled sound mixer.

HollywoodChicago.com Television Rating: 1.5/5.0
Television Rating: 1.5/5.0

Perhaps I’ve simply outgrown laugh track comedies, where disembodied chuckleheads instruct you where to laugh. I didn’t find any of the lines funny in the premiere primarily because I didn’t buy any of the characters. The show has been heralded for mastering the art of geek culture, but this particular episode makes “Revenge of the Nerds” look like “A Brief History of Time.” With the possible exception of Leonard (Johnny Galecki), none of these characters appear to be anything more than one-note caricatures. The show centers on four intellectual goofballs employed at Cal Tech, and the hot girl next door who inexplicably befriends them, probably because she got the Apatowian memo that dorky guys are, like, totally in. The girl, Penny, is played by Kaley Cuoco, who inspires great empathy as she suffers through endless awkward encounters with this league of morons. The third season followed Leonard and Penny as they developed a romantic chemistry that actually felt somewhat human. Unfortunately, tonight’s episode shoves Leonard to the wayside in favor of its overly broad ensemble, much to its detriment.

CBS’s The Big Bang Theory stars Kunal Nayyar as Raj, Jim Parsons as Sheldon, Johnny Galecki as Leonard and Simon Helberg as Howard.
CBS’s The Big Bang Theory stars Kunal Nayyar as Raj, Jim Parsons as Sheldon, Johnny Galecki as Leonard and Simon Helberg as Howard.
Photo credit: Sonja Flemming/CBS

In the opening moments of “The Robotic Manipulation,” the impenetrably aloof Sheldon (Parsons) breaks the surprising news that he intends on taking out a girl, Amy (Mayim Bialik), that he met on a dating site. This inspires his incredulous buddies to label the new couple, “Shamy,” a line that actually generates applause from the enthusiastic crowd. While Sheldon reluctantly pursues love, Howard (Simon Helberg, so uproarious in “A Serious Man”) has become obsessed with a robot whose hand movements inspire him to find more intimate jobs for it to handle. This godawful subplot leads to the umpteenth rip-off of the zipper scene in “There’s Something About Mary,” though it’s not quite as cringe-inducing as Sheldon’s alleged date with Amy, who turns out to be a tired variation on Frasier’s girlfriend from “Cheers.” Needless to say, Bialik is no Bebe Neuwirth, and the script forces her to make random, blunt, socially clueless observations a la Harvey Pekar, such as, “I have dry scalp.” Poor Penny is dragged along to facilitate conversation between the two troglodytes, who take delight in humiliating her.

Kaley Cuoco, Jim Parsons
Kaley Cuoco, Jim Parsons
Photo credit: Sonja Flemming/CBS

Parsons gets the majority of screen time here, and I think that’s a mistake. His character may be amusing if used sparingly, though the writers seem determined to make him their Latka Gravas, and a little bit of his shtick goes a long way. It isn’t even an original shtick. It’s a blatant channeling of Crispin Glover in “Back to the Future,” from his bizarre body language down to his labored line delivery, occasionally punctuated by a heightened intake of breath. There is not a single line his character says that doesn’t sound self-consciously hip and painfully overwritten. Though Parsons certainly has a flair for comic timing, he’s stuck with a character so smug and alien that he’s thoroughly insufferable.

Either this premiere is one of the worst of the new fall season, or “The Big Bang Theory” is one of the most overrated shows on television. There’s nothing here that seems even remotely original. Howard even has one of those cliched mothers who’s always screaming embarrassing put-downs at him from another room. The gag worked great in Scorsese’s “King of Comedy,” but it’s gotten increasingly stale ever since. And I almost forgot to mention the character known as Raj (Kunal Nayyar), who is yet another condescending Indian stereotype on American TV. Listen to how the audience laughs after practically every line he delivers, much like how the laugh track guffawed over every oh-so-precocious remark uttered by little Bobby on “The Brady Bunch.” The audience laughs as if Raj’s Indian accent is funny in and of itself, especially when it’s made to say ludicrous things like, “How does Aquaman poop?”

‘The Big Bang Theory,’ which airs on CBS, stars Jim Parsons, Johnny Galecki, Kaley Cuoco, Simon Helberg and Kunal Nayyar. The show was created by Mark Cendrowski and Peter Chakos. The fourth season premieres on Thursday, September 23, 2010 at 7PM CST.

HollywoodChicago.com staff writer Matt Fagerholm

By MATT FAGERHOLM
Staff Writer
HollywoodChicago.com
matt@hollywoodchicago.com

Anonymous's picture

what ???

big bang is AWSOME !!! WTH are you talking about dude ?????????

champpion's picture

WRONG

dude for this one you’re just OUT, this show is great… what happened with you… maybe you didn’T get the jokes ?? go watch seinfeld dude

Anonymous's picture

Off base

I’m sorry, but you’re way off base here. Maybe you should watch the previous 3 seasons and get a feel for the characters before making broad assumptions.

Anonymous's picture

Thank you!

Anonymous's picture

I’m a huge fan of the

I’m a huge fan of the show-and let me tell you-that was not a good episode to be the first one. You really need to watch seasons one and two where the developement happens. It was actually a pretty funny episode if you already know the characters-but I admit that for a first impression, it wasn’t the best one. But remember, it’s not intended to be a first impression-it was intended to be a 64th impression. So I’d watch some of the earlier ones.

Lucille Too's picture

Finally!

Thank you! I’ve long wondered how this show managed to garner an audience, much less any critical acclaim. The acting is wooden, the stories are dull — the entire thing looks like a castoff from 90’s-era Must See TV. You say you’ve outgrown laugh tracks and boorish studio audiences, but I’d go even further: I’ve outgrown the entire traditional sitcom shtick, which lives on, inexplicably, in shows like this. The overbearing mother who won’t let her man-child grow up, the wacky immigrant who doesn’t understand popular culture, the childish sex puns … please. If this is the Big Bang Theory, count me among the creationists.

Anonymous's picture

That was Frasier’s wife.

That was Frasier’s wife. Please fact-check properly if you are not familiar with modern-day television classics, which it appears you are not.

BrianTT's picture

Try Again

The comparison was clearly to the dating days of Frasier & Lilith as Sheldon has just started dating his girlfriend on BBT. Frasier & Lilith dated for the first two seasons she was on Cheers. Check your familiarity with modern-day television classics.

Brian Tallerico
Content Director HollywoodChicago.com

Anonymous's picture

I don’t think TBBT is

I don’t think TBBT is overrated since a lot of people enjoy watching it, including me. you’re full of crap dude, you don’t even know what you are saying. Don’t judge the whole show by just 1 episode. “Obnoxious cataphrases”, maybe you should try explaining rock paper scissors lizards spock, dumbass…

Ano-ni-moose's picture

Intelligent people also laugh

Intelligent people laugh at this series. Get the picture? Stick to your 30 Rock man hahaha. (Bazinga!)

But seriously, if you don’t like the series, don’t watch it. If it’s just the job being a critic that compels you to watch it, tell your boss “I quit!”. You’re making your life miserable watching a series that don’t suit your taste. ~Now that’s honest and good criticism for you! ;)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

User Login

Free Giveaway Mailing

TV, DVD, BLU-RAY & THEATER REVIEWS

  • Manhunt

    CHICAGO – Patrick McDonald of HollywoodChicago.com appears on “The Morning Mess” with Dan Baker on WBGR-FM (Monroe, Wisconsin) on March 21st, 2024, reviewing the new streaming series “Manhunt” – based on the bestseller by James L. Swanson – currently streaming on Apple TV+.

  • Topdog/Underdog, Invictus Theatre

    CHICAGO – When two brothers confront the sins of each other and it expands into a psychology of an entire race, it’s at a stage play found in Chicago’s Invictus Theatre Company production of “Topdog/Underdog,” now at their new home at the Windy City Playhouse through March 31st, 2024. Click TD/UD for tickets/info.

Advertisement



HollywoodChicago.com on Twitter

archive

HollywoodChicago.com Top Ten Discussions
referendum
tracker