The 10 Biggest Oscar Snubs of 2009

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionE-mail page to friendE-mail page to friendPDF versionPDF version
No votes yet

Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Photo credit: The Weinstein Company

7. “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” by Woody Allen for Best Original Screenplay

VCB” is Allen’s best script in years, a breezy, easy-going examination of love, sex, and cultural clashes during a summer in Spain. Like the Springsteen snub, this one just doesn’t make sense. The Academy clearly loves Woody Allen. They’ve nominated him fourteen times before. And this work was better than half of those choices. The WGA nominated him, which almost always means an equivalent one here. Did someone mis-count the votes? Honestly, this category ended up the most random. “Happy-Go-Lucky” was excluded from several categories, indicating perhaps the Academy didn’t like the movie, but they nominated it here. And I like “In Bruges” and “Frozen River” but the screenplays are not as good as “The Visitor,” “Rachel Getting Married,” or “Vicky Cristina Barcelona”. Maybe too many quality choices made this one too difficult for Academy members and they did make some good choices here, just not the right ones.

Director CHRISTOPHER NOLAN on the set
Director Christopher Nolan on the set
Photo credit: Stephen Vaughan

6. Christopher Nolan for Best Director for “The Dark Knight”

I’m angry that Darren Aronofsky was excluded for his excellent work on “The Wrestler” in favor of dull, boring choices like Ron Howard for “Frost/Nixon” or Stephen Daldry for “The Reader,” but the exclusion of Nolan hurts the most. I would like to talk to the voting body as a whole for a minute. How can a film be worthy of eight nominations, most of them technical, but not Best Director? Do you think editors, cinematographers, etc. act of their own volition? That they’re not guided by the director? Or were you merely prejudiced against what you saw as a superhero movie? Nixon and the Holocaust are more important subjects, so they have to be better directed films, right? It’s just sad.

Rosemarie Dewitt
Rosemarie DeWitt
Photo credit: Sony Pictures Classics

5. Rosemarie DeWitt for Best Supporting Actress for “Rachel Getting Married”

Many, many people are predicting Anne Hathaway to win for “Rachel Getting Married” and you’ll get no argument from me there (especially with Sally Hawkins out of the running…more on that later), but her counterpart in the film, the performance that truly supported the lead and made it great, was snubbed. Hathaway does incredible work but it is largely in part because of how she is balanced by DeWitt’s complex portrayal of the bride-to-be. It’s hard to say who shouldn’t have been nominated in this category - it’s one of the top fives that feels the most correct - but I would probably axe Amy Adams for either DeWitt or Hiam Abbass’ great work in “The Visitor,” and if I had to pick one it would be the former.

James Franco
James Franco
Photo credit: Dale Robinette

4. James Franco for Best Supporting Actor for “Milk” or “Pineapple Express

One of the acting stories of 2008 was ignored by the Academy. James Franco is no longer “that guy from Freaks and Geeks and the Spider-Man movies”. He gave two of the best performances of the year in his vastly different roles in “Milk” and “Pineapple Express” and he should have been nominated for one of them. I feel like the Academy decided they could nominate only one performance from “Milk” and they, correctly, went with Josh Brolin and they decided they could only nominate only one comedic performance and they went with Robert Downey Jr. from “Tropic Thunder”. Of course, someone should have told them that they could nominate two performances from “Milk” or two funny characters, but that would have been too easy. Eddie Marsan’s great and truly supporting work in “Happy-Go-Lucky” being shown the door in favor of what should have been a role that competed in lead actor from Philip Seymour Hoffman in “Doubt” was nearly as annoying.

Anonymous's picture

I hear Let the Right One In

I hear Let the Right One In was released to late to be considered best foreign film but that shouldnt matter since it was the best film 2008.

tdog's picture

gran torino

this was the worst oscar nominations ever. i will not be watching. first, how could clint eastwood not get a nod for acting or directing, why did brad pitt and jolie get nominated they were horrible. bruce springsteen not getting nominated was a joke. the wrestler was 1 of the best songs of the past couple of years, even though he wins the golden globe. christopher nolan not gettin ghte director nod was outrageous. so was robert downey jr. he only was nominated cuz he pretened to be black. the academy only likes films about gays, people overacting, immigrants, and people trying to be black or women trying to be men vice versa. this is horrible. o ya they also loves movies about the holocaust. there wer 500 movies about the holocaust.

Dean's picture

I was underwhelmed by

I was underwhelmed by everything but Ledger’s brilliant performance in TDK. The performance, coupled with tragedy, made TDK feel explosive to most people. To me, it fizzled when HL was off-screen. I still can’t tell you what happens in the film’s final third, and I’ve seen it 3 times. It just doesn’t stick.

BTW, long ago, one way I learned about which movies were the great one was via the Oscars. But what I did was, I went thru each year’s nominations and listed each film that got even one nod. If you were to do this, you would end up with 80 year-centric lists of movies to see.

2008’s list reads as such: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Slumdog Millionaire, The Dark Knight, Milk, Wall-E, Frost/Nixon, The Reader, Doubt, Revolutionary Road, The Wrestler, Frozen River, Changeling, Wanted, The Duchess, Man on Wire, The Class, In Bruges, Encounters at the End of the World, Kung Fu Panda, The Garden, Trouble the Water, Tropic Thunder, The Visitor, Vicki Christina Barcelona, Rachel Getting Married, Revanche, Departures, Australia, The Baader Meinhof Complex, The Betrayal, and Waltz With Bashir.

Nothing to hate on in that list, really. Unless you wanna get nitpicky and say that the three best movies of 2008: The Fall, Synecdoche NY and Wendy and Lucy—are nowhere to be seen on it. But I expected that to happen a LOOONG time ago.

Also, as far as respecting the audience and the box office. I say huzzah to the guy who previously wrote: “They do that already. It’s called The People’s Choice Awards. Watch that and get your fill.” Perfectly said.

Listen, the Academy routinely gives awards to huge blockbusters. Lord of the Rings, Chicago, Gladiator, Dances With Wolves, Braveheart, Crash, Titanic, Forrest Gump, American Beauty, The Silence of the Lambs, Driving Miss Daisy, The English Patient, and on and on we go. Like these movie or not, one thing CANNOT be denied: They each made serious bank at the B.O. BEFORE they were even nominated for their Oscars. So don’t gimme this cryin’ bullcrap about “the academy don’t like us awdience members—wahhh!!!” If you want my opinion, they need to start nominating some movies that made less than a MILLION at the boxoffice—oh, say, movies LIKE The Fall, Synecdoche NY, Wendy and Lucy and, yes, Happy-Go-Lucky and Let The Right One In. But hey, I know that ain’t (always) gonna happen (though it does happen to a few films each year). Yet you don’t see me stompin’ around all mad about it. I grew up a long time ago, and have learned to take joy in the simple existence of these movies. And, maybe, just maybe, I should be thankful they don’t win big awards: this way, they somehow seem like my very own finds. They’re more special that way.

Finally, I would submit that the way to salve any wounds you might have over TDK not being nominated for more than 8 awards, and Wall-E not being nominated for more than 5…is to stop paying attention to the Oscars alltogether. Believe me, they will not miss you, and will keep going on.

Anonymous's picture

“Yet you dont see me

Yet you dont see me stompin’ around all mad about it”

Sounds like your stompin mad about something.

BrianTT's picture

The Academy List

Putting aside our vast difference in opinion on TDK and debate over whether or not you’re “stompin’ around all mad,” I’m intrigued by your “one nomination” list idea and have a suggestion that could make such a process more comprehensive although still flawed - combine it with the Independent Spirit Awards nominees. This year, that would add several must-see movies for 2008 - Wendy & Lucy, Synecdoche, Ballast, The Hurt Locker, Sangre de mi Sangre, Gomorra, Hunger, Secret of the Grain, Silent Light, and Up the Yangtze, plus more.

When you were done, you’d still be missing a large portion of the quality foreign films of the year including Let the Right One In, Tell No One, The Edge of Heaven, Still Life, A Christmas Tale, I’ve Loved You So Long, and The Flight of the Red Balloon. Some of those films are among the best of the year and certainly all worth seeing and more important to the overall cinematic picture of 2008 than, say, Australia or The Duchess.

And having Steven Soderbergh’s (Che), David Gordon Green’s (Snow Angels & Pineapple Express), and even the Coen brothers’ (Burn After Reading) film fall through the cracks seems a shame but I suppose that’s nitpicking.

But it’s an interesting idea.

Anonymous's picture

The main problem is there

The main problem is there are no great movies this year. We could talk all night long (and more) about the dubious merits of The Reader or Benjamin Button, but in the end, the Oscars aren’t really there to please moviegoers. There’s obviously a lot of negativty surrounding TDK, because it’s the kind of film that draws crowds who end up putting it in the top ten of all time on IMDB and so forth, and that’s a thing you have to dislike if you feel that movies are about more than what TDK offers. However, this does not mean that in comparison to other films this year, TDK does not stand out.

I guess it would have been suited to give Nolan a best director nod, given that putting TDK on the “Best Picture” list seems unsuited. But then again, seeing a pile of utter mediocrity in the two films I just mentioned above (especially The Reader), I can only feel that TDK would’ve raised both profile and quality of that category. If anything, The Reader and Benjaming Button are the ones which should’ve only raked in “technical” and acting nominations.

Dean's picture

I debated whether to rise to

I debated whether to rise to the bait of such a stupid comment as “Oh, certainly seems yer stompin’ mad about somethin’” That’s the level of response I would expect from people who might have a problem with what I am mad about: the mass love for a mediocre superhero movie that, save for one performance, is no better than the vast majority of other film denizens of that dull and bankrupt genre.

Jon's picture

Pretentious

And that comment is something I would expect from a person who feels as if they are better and know more about movies than “superhero flick” fans. If you knew anything about film at all you would realize that The Dark Knight is incredibly in each and every individual aspect that makes a film including Direction (Chris Nolan was nominated for Best Director in DGA Awards), Writing (Nomination again for Best Adapted Screenplay in WGA Awards), the seven technical fields it was nominated in by the Academy (Cinematography, Art Direction, Make-Up, Film Editing, Sound Editing, Sound Mixing, and Visual Effects), the Score, and the acting (with brilliant performances by ALL OF THE CAST with special consideration for Heath Ledger, Aaron Eckhart, Morgan Freeman, and Gary Oldman.

Don’t believe me? Look at RottenTomatoes. Read the 94% Reviews of The Dark Knight, then read the 60% reviews of The Reader and the 72% reviews of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.

Should the Academy award The Dark Knight because of the fact that it broke record upon record in the box office and DVD sales? No, of course not. Spiderman 3 did the same thing, and everyone knows that movie sucked. The Dark Knight, however, is clearly deserving of the Nominations in the top categories and just because it received 8 nominations in other CLEARLY DESERVING categories, doesn’t mean it should be snubbed from the Big 3 (Writing, Directing, Producing).

THE READER? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

Anonymous's picture

Every year, there is always

Every year, there is always a movie, or a performance that is overlooked by the Academy. Obviously, we all have differing opinions about every movie. I didn’t think that a statement so blatantly obvious would draw so much hatred out of a crowd.

I thought The Reader was spectacular. I thought Benjamin Button was spectacular. I thought Slumdog Millionaire was a near masterpiece. I thought Milk was above average. I thought Frost/Nixon was just okay.

The beauty about my opinions was that people will disagree with me.

And I am fine with that.

If you ask me, the nominations could have easily been Button, Slumdog, Milk, The Wrestler and The Reader, as I feel like that adequately sums up the Best Pictures.

It would be nice to see The Dark Knight up there…but when push comes to shove, as wonderful as it was…it is just a good movie. It is not the second coming.

And again….my opinions.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

User Login

Free Giveaway Mailing

TV, DVD, BLU-RAY & THEATER REVIEWS

Advertisement



HollywoodChicago.com on X

archive

HollywoodChicago.com Top Ten Discussions
tracker